Handy, Maria

Birth Name Handy, Maria
Gender female

Narrative

Query birth in Winnebago, IL
=====
Maria Chatfield in household of Geo C Bruce
USA Census, 1860
Event Place: Fourth Ward, Sacramento, Sacramento, California
Gender: Female
Age: 30
Race: White
Birth Year (Estimated): 1830
Birthplace: Mo.
Page: 226
Household Role Gender Age Birthplace
Geo C Bruce M 38 N. Y.
Rachel C Bruce F 34 N. Y.
Augusta Bruce F 4 Cal.
Georgiana Bruce F 2 Cal.
Jno Hart M 24 N. Y.
Ellen Hart F 23 N. Y.
J B Reid M 40 R. I.
Jno George M 35 Mich.
J S Remby M 28 Ire.
L Rose M 26 Ire.
W Grave M 28 Mich
R K Levi M 30 Mich
B F Carson M 50 Me.
H Taylor M 35 Me.
Geo Maguire M 22 Mich.
Chas Clay M 35 Mich.
J M Adams M 30 Mich.
Edward Van Brundt M 24 N. Y.
Wesley George M 27 Mich.
P N Norton M 35 Mich.
Jas Van Pelt M 30 N. Y.
Jno Foster M 32 N. Y.
Giles Poormace M 17 N. Y.
Jas Mc Clain M 20 N. Y.
Hugh Mc Craig M 26 Ireland
Maria Chatfield F 30 Mo.
Jas Conbace M 20 Ireland
Augustus Sutpaper M 37 Hanover
Household ID: 1864 , GS Film Number: 803063 , Digital Folder Number: 004211322 , Image Number: 00522

Events

Event Date Place Description Sources
Birth about 1830 Missouri, USA    
Census 1860 Sacramento, Sacramento Co., California, USA    
Residence 1851 California, USA    

Families

Family of Chatfield, Charles and Handy, Maria
Married Husband Chatfield, Charles ( * 10 March 1830 + ... )
   
Event Date Place Description Sources
Divorce     Y  
Marriage 12 April 1850 Winnebago Co., Illinois, USA    
  Narrative

CHATFIELD, CHARLES. - HANDY, MARIA - 1850-04-12 - IL - WINNEBAGO Co.
-----
Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 19, Number 2845, 9 May 1860
Another Divorce. — A complaint was filed yesterday in the District Court by Maria CHATFIELD, praying for a divorce from her husband, Charles Chatfield. The complaint sets forth that the said party were married in Illinois in 1850, and immediately afterward emigrated to this State, where they lived together as man and wife until about the 17th of October, when the defendant abandoned her, and since which time she has been compelled to support herself. The parties reside in this city.
-----
Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 19, Number 2892, 3 July 1860
Divorce Suit.— ln the case of Maria Chatfield vs. Charles CHATFIELD, which was a suit for divorce on the ground of adultery, charged to have been commited by the defendant May 7th, a decree was entered in the Sixth District Court dismissing the bill on the ground of collusion between the parties. The plaintitf afterwards moved for an order setting aside the finding and decree, and for a new trial, on the ground that the decision was against law and evidence. The District Court, after reviewing the facts in the case, comes to the conclusion that the plaintiff was cognizant of the alleged crime and assented thereto, and that the collusion between the parties was so apparent that the motion for a new trial must be annulled. An order was directed to be entered accordingly.

  Attributes
Type Value Notes Sources
_UID 56C1917434DFD511B337709A55C100001FC3
 

Attributes

Type Value Notes Sources
_UID 9BC1917434DFD511B337709A55C100006413
 

Pedigree

    1. Handy, Maria
      1. Chatfield, Charles